- Celebrity couple (X & Y) goes on a romantic date in a hip cafe.
- Paparazzo A, hiding behind some bushes across the street from said cafe, takes photos of a brief moment when Y is smiling while speaking to a waitress and X is grimacing while digging through her bag.
- Paparazzo A sells photos to trashy tabloid rag A for $$$$$.
- Tabloid A publishes photos under headline "X to Y: IT'S OVER! X is enraged over Y talking to a hot waitress during their date, and threatens to move out and take the dogs with her"
- Tabloids B and C splash old photos of X & Y making angry faces (presumably from noticing a paparazzo rather than being angry at each other) all over their covers, and use similar headlines to Tabloid A.
- X & Y separate because of distress from hearing break-up rumors.
- One week later, Paparazzo A takes pictures of X walking her dogs post-separation, looking tired and not perfectly put-together.
- Around the same time, Paparazzo B takes pictures of Y smiling while speaking with his young female cousin at a family barbecue.
- Paparazzi A and B sell pictures to Tabloid A for $$$$$
- Tabloid A publishes photos under the headline "X: HE BROKE MY HEART! X crying during a lonely stroll one week after shocking break-up with Y. Y speaks with young girl: he's a cradle robber, too!"
- Y publicly rebukes and threatens to sue Tabloid A for defamation. He later brings a lawsuit.
- Cash-strapped "friend" of Y releases photos of Y shirtless and drunk at a frat party in college to Tabloid A, which gives this "friend" $$$$$ in return.
- Other celebrities lambaste Y for "poor choices" on Twitter and Facebook.
- Y refuses to issue apology, saying that those photos should have remained private, and publicly rebukes his "friend".
- X does not issue any statements, despite being coerced by reporters.
- Tabloids A, B, C, online magazines 1 and 2, blogs 1 to n, and "reputable" news sources I-V publish stories and opinion columns bashing Y for being an insolent liar, pervert, and cheater and proclaiming X to be a victim.
- Y is forced to issue an apology to X, and he finally does.
- X does not respond immediately, leading "news" sources to bash HER for being indecisive and secretive. Tabloids coin a nickname for her to mock her indecisiveness: "Waity X-ie". Why can't she act the victim like she should?
- "News" sources claim Y's apology is insincere and attack him again. This man can't be trusted to tell the truth!
- X finally responds, saying that she remains friends with Y, does not believe in these rumors of infidelity, and wishes to reunite with him after a period of time. She also asks for the paps to leave her and Y alone.
- "News" sources bash X for not being an "empowered" woman. Is she stupid or what?
- Paps leave X alone, and she is not photographed out and about for weeks. They ignore her plea for them to ignore Y.
- Tabloids A-C claim that she's a lazy bum who is moping around because she just doesn't know what to do with her life after the break-up. They make up a new nickname: "Lazy X-y". She's a typical clingy chick who can't go on without her man!
- Y wins defamation suit against Tabloid A for an undisclosed amount.
- "News" sources scream injustice at the ruling, claiming that the judge is a fraud who let a known pedophile go free because this wealthy celebrity bribed him.
Sunday, June 26, 2011
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)